Palliative Care Au
Clinical
Strontium 89
Dr Michael Boyer




MedAu

Resources

Columns

Computing

*gr clinicalbar

Aboriginal Health

Adolescent Medicine

Anaesthetics

Complementary Medicine

Dermatology

Drugs and Alcohol

Emergency

ENT

Geriatrics

ICU

Internal Medicine

Musculoskeletal

Paediatrics

Psychiatry

Sexual Health

Surgery

Women's Health

Palliative Care

Fentanyl Patches

Common Problems with Morphine Use

Dressings for Malignant Wounds

Hypercalcaemia

Ketamine

Lymphoedema - Palliative Physiotherapy

Morphine in Nursing Homes

NSAIDS in Palliative Care

Antidepressants in Palliative Care

Bowel Obstruction in Palliative Care

Secondary Malignancy

Strontium 89

Strontium in Prostate Cancer

Terminal Restlessness


Search MedAu

We are seeing a lot more metastatic bone disease today and dealing with the associated pain can be a major challenge in palliative care. Where does the use of Strontium 89 fit in to the therapeutic approach to bone pain? The following lecture notes will help us to understand the role of Strontium 89. - Andrew Binns

Notes from the lecture delivered to the Fourth Annual Symposium of the Institute of Palliative Medicine in March 1995 by Dr Michael Boyer, staff specialist oncologist, RPAH. These notes have been reproduced from the society's October 1995 newsletter with permission from the management committee and the author.


Strontium 89 (Metastron) has been used around the world for some time, but it is only recently available in Australia. It is a pure beta emitter with a half life of 50 days. It is expensive, costing more than $2000 per dose. It is administered as an intravenous injection of an aqueous solution. Brays travel only to a depth of 1-2 mm in human tissue, can't be used for imaging and are little risk to others.

Strontium "imitates" the behaviour of calcium: ie. is taken up and incorporated into bone. There is preferential retention in metastatic lesions compared to normal bone. It is not known why this occurs. The total body retention of strontium 89 therefore depends on the extent of the metastatic bone disease.

It has also been used in sclerotic metastases from other primaries including breast and unknown primary.

It is excreted in the urine (90%) and bile (10%). The majority of the dose is excreted in the first 48 hours after injection.

 

Results:

In single arm studies, improvement in pain from "widespread" prostatic sclerotic bony metastases was demonstrated in 60-80% of treated patients.

Only one small (32 patients) double blind study comparing strontium 89 with placebo has been carried out. Complete relief of pain was achieved in 15% of treated patients vs 0% of the untreated group.

Randomised trials have shown results equal to the use of hemibody radiotherapy in terms of survival and pain relief, but better results with regard to the development of and number of new sites of pain (decreased by 20-30%).

 

Side effects:

There is less GIT toxicity than hemibody radiation and similar haematological toxicity.

The major toxicity is haematological, especially thrombocytopaenia. Typically there is a 20-40% fall in platelet count with the nadir at about six weeks after the injection.

There is occasionally a transient flare in pain.

Because of urinary excretion, low levels of radiation will be present in the urine for up to 10 days. Care must be taken in handling urine during this time. Patients need to take care with personal hygiene during this time and to double flush the toilet.

It is not considered to be "environmentally damaging".

In general it is suggested for patients with sclerotic metastases who cannot get relief any other way who have diffuse pain. It is not approved for use with lytic secondaries.

It is typically repeated once at three months.



Discussion
Strontium 89
Strontium 89

Linda Voegtlin, voegt357@aol.com
Posted Sunday, August 23, 1998 16:5


I am a breast cancer patient with bone metastasis.. I am presently on duragesic patches for pain, and am considering going for an injection of 89 to help ellieviate some of the Pain I have. Are there any therapies that I can do in conjunction with the strontium 89 that are effective in slowing the spread of the lesions in my bones? My primary cancer was diagnosed in 1992,
and is infiltrating ductal carcinoma. Stage 3
I have had Chemo, bone marrow transplant / chemo
3 courses of readiation 1 primary and 2 for pain!!
I have been offeredd basically the same chemo again, but would like to try something new.
Any information you can direct me to will be appreciated.
Thanks, Linda C. Voegtlin





Ramon Rivas-Llamas, rivas@cln.megared.net.mx
Posted 7/1/99 15:35


What is the risk for a patient with bone matastases Ca prostate who has 90,000/mm3 platelet if I give to him this drug?
I am hematologist and I am with interest in knowing this medicament for the blood complicationes that it can present.
Thank you for your atention




Linda Cradit, lcradit@mcn.net
Posted 20/2/99 3:38 AM


My husband Bill has metastatic prostate cancer to the bone. He has just received the Strontium 89 treatment. We are hopeful this will give him back some quality life. He has been very sick with two visits to the hospital for rehydrations and for blood transfusions. He is 58 and was diagnosed with prostate cancer at the age of 55, with a PSA level of 137. They did not remove his prostate because the cancer had already spread to the lymph system.
I want to thank you for your very insightful internet sight. I found it helpful in understanding this new treatment.
Sincerely,
Linda C.






Please send us your comment / tip
My Name:
My E-mail:
Select from one of the current topics

or Name a new topic
Comment:
Return to top of page

This page was last built on 20/2/99; 2:06:30 PM.
It was originally posted on 12/4/98; 8:40:54 AM.
Webmaster:

LemLink

lemlink@medicineau.net.au


Reset 1/12/98

Secondary Malignancy

Index Strontium in Prostate Cancer


MedAu MedicineAu